Viewing entries in
Child Custody

Florida child custody: School boundary determination

Florida child custody: School boundary determination

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

When parents cannot agree on a school in which to enroll their child, how does the court decide what is in the best interest of the child? The school boundary determination or designation is usually included in a Florida parenting plan. This is a statement of which parent’s address will be used to register the child for school. But if this is missing, or the parents ultimately do not agree before a parenting plan is entered, the court considers the best interest of the child. This was an issue in the case Velez v. Lafontaine, 5D20-2350 (Fla. 5th DCA April 30, 2021).

Temporary versus permanent changes in circumstances for modification of Florida parenting plan

Temporary versus permanent changes in circumstances for modification of Florida parenting plan

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

The standard for modification of a Florida parenting plan is a substantial, material change in circumstances that was not contemplated at the time of entry of the parenting plan. The court must find that a modification is in the best interest of the child. Does this change have to be permanent to qualify for the modification standard? This was explored in the case P.D.V-G. v. B.A.V.-G., 2D20-1178 (Fla. 2d DCA May 7, 2021).

Modifying Florida parenting plan based on contempt

Modifying Florida parenting plan based on contempt

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

If a parent refuses to follow a parenting plan, can a court change custody as part of holding that parent in contempt? The answer depends on if certain procedural requirements have been met. This was an issue in the case J.G.J. v. J.H., 2D20-127 (Fla. 2d DCA April 30, 2021).

Modification of Florida parenting plan reversed absent required findings

Modification of Florida parenting plan reversed absent required findings

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

A substantial, unanticipated change in circumstances must be found before a court can modify a Florida parenting plan. A court has less discretion in modifying a parenting plan than it does in initially creating one. This was an issue in the case Idelson v. Carmer, 2D20-1221 (Fla. 2d DCA April 30, 2021).

Florida court's reconsideration of relocation petition deemed error

Florida court's reconsideration of relocation petition deemed error

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

A final order in a Florida family law case usually remains in effect until one or both parties challenges the order and a new order is entered. The order can be challenged by appeal, a petition for modification or other procedural avenues available by law. In the case Duryea v. Bono, 2D19-225 (Fla. 2d DCA April 21, 2021), the court considered the appeal of a mother whose request for relocation was denied after it was already previously granted by court order.

A parent's improved living conditions may not be enough to modify a Florida parenting plan

A parent's improved living conditions may not be enough to modify a Florida parenting plan

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Child Custody

What constitutes a substantial change in circumstances that warrants modification of a Florida parenting plan? It may be easier to say what does not constitute a substantial change. Florida law places a high burden on a parent seeking to modify a parenting plan - a court has much less discretion in modifying a parenting plan than it does in initially creating it. In the case Villalba v. Villalba, 4D20-1474 (Fla. 4th DCA April 28, 2021), the court considered the issue of a parent’s improved living conditions as a basis to modify time-sharing.

Prospective timesharing modification prohibited in Florida

Prospective timesharing modification prohibited in Florida

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

In most cases, a parent may not relocate more than 50 miles from his or her current residence with the parties’ minor child without the written permission of the other parent or a court order. How does this provision affect active duty military service members who may have to relocate frequently due to military orders? This was an issue in the case Amiot v. Olmstead, 1D20-680 (Fla. 1st DCA May 11, 2021) in which the primary focus was on the trial court’s award of prospective time-sharing to the mother, an active duty servicemember, if she moved back to Florida.

Consideration of parent's mental health records in Florida child custody case

Consideration of parent's mental health records in Florida child custody case

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

Evidence of a parent’s mental health may be considered when a Florida parenting plan is being established or modified. If a parent objects to his or her mental health records being admitted into evidence or explored, the court must decide if the objection is valid or if it should be overruled. In the case Brooks v. Brooks, 1D20-2346 (Fla. 1st DCA April 20, 2021), the former husband appealed a final judgment of divorce based on the court’s reliance on his disability records.

Florida parenting plan should match final judgment

Florida parenting plan should match final judgment

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

When a final judgment in a Florida family law case is inconsistent with exhibits such a parenting plan, confusion can follow. In the case Couture v. Couture, 1D20-2722 (Fla. 1st DCA April 1, 2021), a final judgment gave the father majority time-sharing, but the parenting plan attached did not reflect that.

Payment of a guardian ad litem's fees after voluntary dismissal of a Florida child custody case

Payment of a guardian ad litem's fees after voluntary dismissal of a Florida child custody case

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

A guardian ad litem can be appointed in a Florida child custody case to help a judge determine the best interest of a child when parents cannot agree. The guardian’s fees are usually paid by the parent with the court determining what percentage of the fee each parent should pay. The payment of a guardian’s fee was an issue in the case Helinski v. Helinski, 3D19-2270 (Fla. 3d DCA March 31, 2021).

Automatic transition to unsupervised visits ruled impermissible in Florida child custody case

Automatic transition to unsupervised visits ruled impermissible in Florida child custody case

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

Supervised visits in a Florida child custody case are ordered when a court finds that unsupervised visits are not in the best interest of a child. This could be because a parent has placed a child in dangerous situations previously or the parent has otherwise demonstrated that he or she is incapable of protecting the child’s welfare with unsupervised visits. When supervised visits are ordered, a court usually has to state how the parent can eventually gain unsupervised visits. This was an issue in the case Natali v. Natali, 2D20-513 (Fla. 2d DCA March 26, 2021).

Waiver of therapist-patient privilege in Florida child custody case

Waiver of therapist-patient privilege in Florida child custody case

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

A therapist who treats a minor child may be barred from testifying about the child’s treatment by Florida’s psychotherapist-patient privilege. This privilege means information related to the treatment is confidential and may only be disclosed if allowed by the patient. In the case of a minor child who is not competent to decide whether privilege should be waived, who can speak for the child in this regard? This was an issue in the case S.H.Y. v. P.G., 2D19-4646 (Fla. 2d DCA March 26, 2021).

Modification of a Florida parenting plan does not require showing of detriment to a child

Modification of a Florida parenting plan does not require showing of detriment to a child

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

Modification of a Florida parenting plan requires a showing of a substantial change in circumstances which was not contemplated at the time of entry of the plan. The standard does not require a court to consider whether or not the status quo will be detrimental to a child. This was an issue in the case R.S. v. S.K., 2D20-454 (Fla. 2d DCA March 12, 2021).

Affect of default on a Florida child custody case

Affect of default on a Florida child custody case

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

Child custody issues in Florida generally cannot be decided by default. This is because the best interest of the child is the paramount concern, and granting one parent custody rights over the other without allowing the other parent the chance to present evidence concerning the best interest of the child may be detrimental. A default is entered when a party fails to timely respond to a petition. A default means the party who failed to respond admits the allegations made by the other party. This was an issue in the case Corridon v. Corridon, 3D20-0596 (Fla. 3d DCA February 17, 2021).

Florida court holds father in contempt for failure to deliver child's passport to mother

Florida court holds father in contempt for failure to deliver child's passport to mother

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

When a party willfully refuses to follow a court order, that party may be held in contempt by the court. Contempt carries the possibility of punishment ranging from monetary fines to incarceration. A father who refused to surrender his child’s passport to the mother of the child in violation of a court order was the subject of the case Harrington v. Pospishil, 4D20-891 (Fla. 4th DCA February 17, 2021).

Jurisdiction of a Florida family court judge after referring a matter to a general magistrate

Jurisdiction of a Florida family court judge after referring a matter to a general magistrate

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

Parties to a Florida family law proceeding have the right to have court reporter appear at and record a hearing. This is often important to do in order to preserve a party’s appellate rights. Without a transcript of the trial court’s proceedings, an appellate court may not be able to determine if an error was committed. This is illustrated in the case Posso v. Sierra, 5D20-578 (Fla. 5th DCA February 12, 2021).

Determining Florida child custody case jurisdiction under the UCCJEA

Determining Florida child custody case jurisdiction under the UCCJEA

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

A case that was appealed last year in the Florida 1st District Court of Appeal was reconsidered and a new opinion was released. The case involved a dispute about child custody jurisdiction between Florida and Oregon, and this time, the maternal grandmother and paternal grandparents of the child were at odds about the court’s prior ruling on jurisdiction. The case is Lunsford v. Engle, 4D19-774 (Fla.4th DCA January 20, 2021).

Florida child custody: Denial of holiday timesharing to parent requires factual findings justifying the denial

Florida child custody: Denial of holiday timesharing to parent requires factual findings justifying the denial

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

Shared parental responsibility in Florida is routinely awarded unless a parent can show having shared parental responsibility is detrimental to a child. There is also the option of awarding shared parental responsibility, but granting ultimate decision making authority to one parent. This issue was appealed in the case Glevis v. Glevis, 2D19-4530 (Fla. 2d DCA January 15, 2021).

Standard for modification of Florida parenting plan

Standard for modification of Florida parenting plan

Posted by Nydia Streets of Streets Law in Florida Child Custody

Modification of a Florida parenting plan requires a finding by a court of a substantial, material and unanticipated change in circumstances. Failure to include findings to this effect usually requires reversal of the final judgment on appeal. The case Romeo v. Romeo, 2D19-3237 (Fla. 2d DCA November 20, 2020) sheds light on this standard.